<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Digital Rangefinder: the Epson R-D1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/</link>
	<description>Blogging about Photoblogging</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wiggy</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-17338</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-17338</guid>
		<description>Ross you are an ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross you are an ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: townes</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-13491</link>
		<dc:creator>townes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 00:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-13491</guid>
		<description>Wow, you're all over the web with your blogs, but it's unfortunate that you're a crappy photogrpher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you're all over the web with your blogs, but it's unfortunate that you're a crappy photogrpher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RML</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-11569</link>
		<dc:creator>RML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-11569</guid>
		<description>What can I say?! Had the R-D1 for half a year now. It's wonderful! No more hassle with having film developed and scanning it (I still have some 200 rolls left that need scanning!), on the fly changing iso value, wonderful colour rendition, good noise supression at high iso, compact, M mount... I couldn't ask for more. A lower price would be nice, though.

RML
http://shardsofphotography.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say?! Had the R-D1 for half a year now. It's wonderful! No more hassle with having film developed and scanning it (I still have some 200 rolls left that need scanning!), on the fly changing iso value, wonderful colour rendition, good noise supression at high iso, compact, M mount... I couldn't ask for more. A lower price would be nice, though.</p>
<p>RML<br />
<a href="http://shardsofphotography.blogspot.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/shardsofphotography.blogspot.com');" rel="nofollow">http://shardsofphotography.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Green</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-5955</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-5955</guid>
		<description>SLAP!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SLAP!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: btezra</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-5956</link>
		<dc:creator>btezra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-5956</guid>
		<description>~if Jim's did not sting enough...*slap, slap*~


p.s. I'd dish out $3k for a Leica though, and I am accepting donations to make that a reality   ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~if Jim's did not sting enough...*slap, slap*~</p>
<p>p.s. I'd dish out $3k for a Leica though, and I am accepting donations to make that a reality   <img src='http://blog.photoblogs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuoppi</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-5957</link>
		<dc:creator>tuoppi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-5957</guid>
		<description>Oh... my... god... it costs three grands. -_-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh... my... god... it costs three grands. -_-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixpop</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-5958</link>
		<dc:creator>pixpop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-5958</guid>
		<description>I think it only makes sense if a) you already have a bunch of Leica mount lenses or b) you want rangefinder focusing, but digital capture. If that's your situation, what other option do you have?

BTW, I think they'll sell all 10,000 easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it only makes sense if a) you already have a bunch of Leica mount lenses or b) you want rangefinder focusing, but digital capture. If that's your situation, what other option do you have?</p>
<p>BTW, I think they'll sell all 10,000 easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matto</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-5959</link>
		<dc:creator>matto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-5959</guid>
		<description>it's not even full frame.  if it was full frame i'd be lusting.  i'm glad they did it though.  that cosina guy is on a mission to save the rangefinder and bring it to the masses.
 
the funniest thing about this camera is, you need to wind it to cock the shutter.  it has a winder!  hahahaha

bah.  slapslapslap.  it's dorky.

i've read that leica is working on something that might be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it's not even full frame.  if it was full frame i'd be lusting.  i'm glad they did it though.  that cosina guy is on a mission to save the rangefinder and bring it to the masses.</p>
<p>the funniest thing about this camera is, you need to wind it to cock the shutter.  it has a winder!  hahahaha</p>
<p>bah.  slapslapslap.  it's dorky.</p>
<p>i've read that leica is working on something that might be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miles</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-5960</link>
		<dc:creator>miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-5960</guid>
		<description>You have to wind it? Hahaha, that really is perfect!

Leica have the digital back coming out right? That's like $3500 by itself I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to wind it? Hahaha, that really is perfect!</p>
<p>Leica have the digital back coming out right? That's like $3500 by itself I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nevets</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2004/11/26/a-digital-rangefinder-the-epson-r-d1/#comment-5961</link>
		<dc:creator>nevets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=395#comment-5961</guid>
		<description>ah... you kids just don't understand

If you've ever used a leica, you'd understand what this camera is all about.  its an attempt to give you the same experience as a leica rangefinder, but with digital.  nothing on the market even comes close to this right now.

The important thing here is the leica glass... interchangable lenses... compact size, etc.

Sure the major complaint on this unit is the 1.5 maginification - since the widest leica lens that would work on this is a 21mm, you barely get a decent wide angle -- although there are voigtlander lenses that are wider.

The winder is a dorky item for sure... but dorky in a camera geek kind of way. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah... you kids just don't understand</p>
<p>If you've ever used a leica, you'd understand what this camera is all about.  its an attempt to give you the same experience as a leica rangefinder, but with digital.  nothing on the market even comes close to this right now.</p>
<p>The important thing here is the leica glass... interchangable lenses... compact size, etc.</p>
<p>Sure the major complaint on this unit is the 1.5 maginification - since the widest leica lens that would work on this is a 21mm, you barely get a decent wide angle -- although there are voigtlander lenses that are wider.</p>
<p>The winder is a dorky item for sure... but dorky in a camera geek kind of way. <img src='http://blog.photoblogs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
