<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bystander Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.photoblogs.org/2005/07/29/bystander-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2005/07/29/bystander-journalism/</link>
	<description>The Photoblogs.org Blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: the farmers wife</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2005/07/29/bystander-journalism/#comment-11034</link>
		<dc:creator>the farmers wife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.photoblogs.org/?p=671#comment-11034</guid>
		<description>I work for a news organization and can you that in general they seem frightened to death of the blogging phenomenon, as if bloggers will steal their thunder or something. 

You will notice they cannot even utter the word "blogger" or "photoblogger", as if they're dirty words. They've created the terms "bystander journalists" or in the case of the broadcast media, "citizen journalists" as if they need to legitimize it in some way.

Anyone else noticed this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for a news organization and can you that in general they seem frightened to death of the blogging phenomenon, as if bloggers will steal their thunder or something. </p>
<p>You will notice they cannot even utter the word "blogger" or "photoblogger", as if they're dirty words. They've created the terms "bystander journalists" or in the case of the broadcast media, "citizen journalists" as if they need to legitimize it in some way.</p>
<p>Anyone else noticed this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
