<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Canon DSLR announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/</link>
	<description>Blogging about Photoblogging</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: james chen</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-16566</link>
		<dc:creator>james chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 04:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-16566</guid>
		<description>there is always a new model new amazing features so it doesnot become obsolete....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is always a new model new amazing features so it doesnot become obsolete....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie FlorCruz</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-12322</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie FlorCruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-12322</guid>
		<description>Cameras become obselete, however the awesome images taken with them never do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameras become obselete, however the awesome images taken with them never do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxott</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-12314</link>
		<dc:creator>sxott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-12314</guid>
		<description>As a 10D user, I'm looking forward to more new toys such as this to drive the price of a 20D down with it. I waited until the 20D came out to upgrade from a D30. It's hard to top the lenses already available. huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a 10D user, I'm looking forward to more new toys such as this to drive the price of a 20D down with it. I waited until the 20D came out to upgrade from a D30. It's hard to top the lenses already available. huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaKaL</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-12299</link>
		<dc:creator>PaKaL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-12299</guid>
		<description>"3.5% spot meter is a rock'n addition...along with 1/3 stops iso settings"

Well these additions are pure firmware stuff...
Canon is used to do that and now you can forget any useful firmware updates for the 20D...

Except a big LCD and a new body, most of the "great" features are done by firmware code updates...

It's about the same story as the 300D with a 10D firmware hack...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"3.5% spot meter is a rock'n addition...along with 1/3 stops iso settings"</p>
<p>Well these additions are pure firmware stuff...<br />
Canon is used to do that and now you can forget any useful firmware updates for the 20D...</p>
<p>Except a big LCD and a new body, most of the "great" features are done by firmware code updates...</p>
<p>It's about the same story as the 300D with a 10D firmware hack...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-12297</link>
		<dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-12297</guid>
		<description>I'm quite glad about the minimal improvements actually - I bought a 20d in october and I was worried that it would soon be obsolote in the New Year.  Now I don't need to worry about upgrading for another year or so.  What I'd really like is a 5D with a slightly quicker frame rate :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm quite glad about the minimal improvements actually - I bought a 20d in october and I was worried that it would soon be obsolote in the New Year.  Now I don't need to worry about upgrading for another year or so.  What I'd really like is a 5D with a slightly quicker frame rate <img src='http://blog.photoblogs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-12296</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-12296</guid>
		<description>I prefer if it had more than 8 megapixels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer if it had more than 8 megapixels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-12295</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-12295</guid>
		<description>I gotta admit, that 85mm looks the ticket.

Now im waiting for them to upgrade the 1d series as they are seriously looking dated now and dammit, hasselblad have a 22mb camera and so should canon with their 1ds range</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta admit, that 85mm looks the ticket.</p>
<p>Now im waiting for them to upgrade the 1d series as they are seriously looking dated now and dammit, hasselblad have a 22mb camera and so should canon with their 1ds range</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blinks</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-12291</link>
		<dc:creator>blinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-12291</guid>
		<description>3.5% spot meter is a rock'n addition...along with 1/3 stops iso settings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.5% spot meter is a rock'n addition...along with 1/3 stops iso settings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-12290</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-12290</guid>
		<description>I think they got 5d's body and put inside a 20d with some improvements. Not worthy for 20d users, but I think 10d users will like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they got 5d's body and put inside a 20d with some improvements. Not worthy for 20d users, but I think 10d users will like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mute</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoblogs.org/2006/02/21/new-canon-dslr-announced/#comment-12286</link>
		<dc:creator>Mute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoblogs.org/?p=829#comment-12286</guid>
		<description>Improvements in the sensor and imaging technology were expected, this is the first upgrade that's not made improvements there, and there were a few other areas that could have been improved, especially when you compare it to the features of the nikon d200 (especially in regards to flash operation), which is the camera people thought Canon would be aiming at. 

As it turns out Canon seems to have been aiming more at d70 buyers than d200, perhaps because they intend to bring out a new camera to compete with the d200. Who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Improvements in the sensor and imaging technology were expected, this is the first upgrade that's not made improvements there, and there were a few other areas that could have been improved, especially when you compare it to the features of the nikon d200 (especially in regards to flash operation), which is the camera people thought Canon would be aiming at. </p>
<p>As it turns out Canon seems to have been aiming more at d70 buyers than d200, perhaps because they intend to bring out a new camera to compete with the d200. Who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
